One, Two, Three, Gone.
Three of us in one head makes four of us in one bed.
What American accent do you have? Your Result: Philadelphia Your accent is as Philadelphian as a cheesesteak! If you're not from Philadelphia, then you're from someplace near there like south Jersey, Baltimore, or Wilmington. if you've ever journeyed to some far off place where people don't know that Philly has an accent, someone may have thought you talked a little weird even though they didn't have a clue what accent it was they heard. | |
The Northeast | |
The Midland | |
The Inland North | |
The South | |
Boston | |
The West | |
North Central | |
What American accent do you have? Quiz Created on GoToQuiz |
Lou, did you really go to Bob Jones U? *Horror film shriek*
Lou,
You are a graduate of Bob Jones? Well I'll be double dipped in dogshit, and there was I thinking you were human! You seem to have survived the experience all right though. Bravo. ;-)
Louis
Lou,
You got booted from BJU after one semester for thinking? Shortly after which you engaged in the game of horizontal table tennis?
Priceless.
Oh dear, I think I've just pissed a kidney laughing! That HAS to be the funniest thing I've read since what Kristine said a post or two ago. You guys cracketh me up.
Louis
LouFCD ( he's not the messiah, he's just a very naughty boy)
Quote
It was also the beginning of several years of internal turmoil (not to mention the beginning of the end of my BJU career), for which I am now grateful, but wish never to repeat.
Indeed, that is the very real turmoil that AFD etc could not possibly stomach, they are that far removed from reality by their Mythology, that they suffer from institutional schizophrenia.
I think Mythology has something to say about that.... somewhere.
Oh yeah ....thats right......it REQUIRES being reborn, who wants to re-live the birth trauma? It could be like a very bad acid trip for the hard core fundamentalist.
Mythology in fact, it is full of such journeys, 40 days in the desert, Job wrestling his demons in his sleep the whole tale of Noah is a tale of rebirth, not to mention most of the tales of snakes in Myth, complete with snakes eating their own tails.
The snake shedding its skin is the archetypal rebirth symbol in Myth since everyone in ancient times would immediately recognize the symbol or sign. Nowadays who has seen a dried out snake skin while out and about?
A very real human experience that at one level works IF the story is taken as true OR is experienced by the journey taker.
Science deflates Myth as true history and for those that are unable to see beyond the words, removes meaning which causes all sorts of teeth gnashing...such as UD Joe's' and AFD's denial.
The real problem is that the clash of science vs Myth produces people trapped in a reality no-mans land.
When objectivist rationality treats Myth as true stories a self created hyper technical h3ll is created where absolutes govern and nuance and subjective reasoning are meaningless.
If Myth were not mythandled by major religions and charlatans like Dembski and his moronic minions but accepted as they were always meant to be accepted; as windows into a magical reality full of wonder and wisdom, though not absolute truths, then there would be no need to have the stamp of approval from science.
[Warning: length]
Unlike Lou I never was a preacher but I was the best student in my Sunday school/Bible classes, even when I wasn’t buying it anymore. (And why were the bored, disinterested students the ones who have hung on to the faith?)
I was talking to a co-worker who has a similar background about how it drives us nuts when believers violate the spirit of their religion in following the letter of scripture (i.e., charlatans). I think that atheists who had a religious upbringing never quite discard that concern for the spirit of what we’ve been taught; I wish the UD folks would consider motivation for our “materialism.” If the church really wants only mediocre minds and lukewarm conformists, that is definitely the message I received. And if it wants people to lie, then who occupies the moral high ground?
Re: Myths. Dembski said in his sermon that moral pain was more important than the physical pain. Whatever you think of that opinion, I haven’t been able to forget it and it did raise a few questions in my mind. Therefore, for the good of his soul, I would ask Dembski, if I could, what sacrifice he would be willing to make in the name of something else he spoke of, love of one’s neighbor. Specifically, I would like him to state yea or nay whether he subscribes to some of the loopier beliefs espoused by his colleagues (denial of the HIV-AIDS link, global warming denial, etc.) and if he would be willing to sacrifice these, at least, in the face of their possible detrimental effect upon other peoples’ lives—and speak out against them.
Also he should speak out against those arguments for intelligent design that he knows are mere creationist restatements. Why would he not do this, if there is scientific evidence instead? ;)
I understand how difficult and frightening it is to sacrifice one’s deeply-held notions and endure the subsequent moral pain of uncertainty, but it seems to me that Dembski is talking about a choice that a lot of us have already made—but he doesn’t see that, since our choices took us away from Jesus. Well, I’m not asking Dembski to give up Jesus; I’m willing to step away from that position, though I retain all the objections to religion that I’ve stated previously.
I’d be willing to draw the line behind the ones that I’ve previously drawn; would he be willing to draw the line somewhere? Pseudoscience has real consequences in people’s lives. So does valid science. Isn’t the pursuit of science an expression of love of one’s neighbor?
Quote (Lou FCD @ Dec. 07 2006,08:36)
True story. Sucky part of that for them is that I was one of the faithful. I really just wanted to reconcile what the Bible was teaching, I wasn't in any way questioning my faith... until I got the run-around.
...
It was also the beginning of several years of internal turmoil (not to mention the beginning of the end of my BJU career), for which I am now grateful, but wish never to repeat.
It’s been five years since I left the church (and my 18 year long job as a pastor) and I am still trying to reconcile many things in my mind. You mention you were “one of the faithful.” I prefer the word “sincere.” I see very few in the church who are there for sincere and intellectually honest reasons. That’s one of the reasons I left.
I can readily accept the Bible as errant, but I do believe it is a reliable account of man’s understanding of his relationship with the Judeo/Christian deity. Perspective is everything.
The reasons I choose to remain a Christian despite what I have seen and experienced in the church are two-fold:
First, the principles work in my own life. Keeping a Sabbath has allowed my wife and I to raise two incredible young men—both of whom are sincere, thinking, compassionate and strong. Loving others has helped me to build relationships that are strong and mutually beneficial.
Second, (at the risk of sounding like Zero) I have had numerous experiences which lead me to believe there is a “spiritual existence.” I don’t have a complete grasp of that spiritual “place,” but I am confident it exists. In my own life I have been able to grasp that place through worshipping the Christian God. (That is not to say others may have been able to grasp that place through other means.)
(If anyone is interested I would be happy to post some of those experiences at my blog and we can discuss them. There are hundreds of them documented in my journals over the last 25 years. Some could obviously be subjective, but many are difficult to explain. I am not an evangelist, but I would like my thinking on this matter critiqued and you guys seem more than able to discuss logical fallicy.)
Quote (Louis @ Dec. 07 2006,04:50)
Lou,
You got booted from BJU after one semester for thinking?
Ah, the fundies stole his adolescence, so now he's reliving it through JanieBelle and Kate.
Luckily I escaped fundyland at 14, still early enough to sow my oats.
I visited BJU in the 80's. Highlights of the trip:
1) The "dating lounge", where prim couples held hands on sofas under the watchful eyes of chaperones, and
2) The chain-link fence surrounding the campus, topped with strands of barbed wire. You'd have expected the barbed wire to be canted outward to repel intruders, but no, it was canted inward, as if BJU were a prison (which I suppose it was, for people like Lou).
It’s been five years since I left the church (and my 18 year long job as a pastor) and I am still trying to reconcile many things in my mind.
Wow. It must have been wrenching to leave after 18 years as pastor.
Quote
(If anyone is interested I would be happy to post some of those experiences at my blog and we can discuss them.
I'd certainly be interested in reading and commenting on them.
Quote
I couldn't reconcile "God is Love" with "No man cometh unto the Father but by me". The short answer is they go to ####. There is no "Age of Accountability" in the Bible. That's a feel-good church doctrine to appease the masses.
Wow. At least when I finally had the courage to ask about how God could be so mean, killing the Egyptian first-born for what their parents had done, I was told (because my church wasn’t fundy, although some people were) that God sends all children to heaven no matter what they believed, because they were children. But I had already bought out of Christianity at around age nine or ten, anyway. That’s pretty young. Considering that I continued on alone in this for years, I raise the “design” question again.
Quote
I'd certainly be interested in reading and commenting on them.
So would I.
Quote (keiths @ Dec. 07 2006,16:02)
Wow. It must have been wrenching to leave after 18 years as pastor.
Thanks Keiths for your kind words. Yes, it was difficult, but (mostly non-Christian) friends helped ease the transition. Now I see it as an amazingly positive step for my family and, surprisingly, my faith.
Quote (keiths @ Dec. 07 2006,16:02)
I'd certainly be interested in reading and commenting on them.
I'll post some when I get a chance and I will let you know.
Don't enable me Lou! Oops, too late.
Louis—BTW—
Was that “crank” call last night good for you? Because it was confusing for me. You sounded like a woman—well, a woman imitating a man, anyway. And you’re so bitter about the Smithsonian. Did you have a film showing there that got yanked?
And when I asked for your address, you got all defensive: “I have a dress! I have a couple of dresses! Okay, they’re in my closet at my place in Canada, but still!” So you live in Canada?
Um. That was you, Louis, right?
Uh-oh. :D
"The dating lounge - you weren't technically allowed to hold a girl's hand ANYWHERE on campus, but with the right monitors on duty there, you might get lucky and get away with it. We weren't allowed to mingle with girls after dinner, except in specified places (the dating lounge may have been one of them - forgive me, it's been a while).
Dinner was a formal affair, and you weren't allowed to miss that. Afterwards, you were allowed to walk a girl back to her dorm (just to the intersection in the sidewalk out front), but you couldn't hold her hand, kiss her, or stop moving. Everyone learned to walk very, very, very slowly, to extend the amount of time you could spend with your sweetie. That was nicknamed "The Snail Trail", and was supervised all along the way.
Freshmen weren't allowed to leave campus, except for church or for outreach extensions supervised by upper-classmen. An off-campus date was unthinkable.
The story with the fence was that it was to keep out the criminal element, but I don't think that fooled very many of us. We knew what it was for."
This was a college????
I cannot imagine treating minors in this manner, much less
adults.
Thanks for the encouragement guys.
Before I share some of the supposed “supernatural” experiences I’ve had, I thought it might be good to think through how experiences can be evaluated.
When I relate an experience, there are several possiblities:
1. It is truly a supernatural experience.
2. It is coincidence/natural process which I misinterpreted
3. I’m lying
4. I’m deceived (either by my own psychosis, my unintentional superimposing after the fact some details that weren’t really present or by other’s intentional plan)
I think that pretty much covers the possibilities, but if there are others feel free to let me know.
Unbelievable
Quote (Lou FCD @ Dec. 07 2006,18:10)
The members of my church were sadly disappointed that I would go to such a liberal college as BJ.
I'm scared to even ask, but what colleges did they view as 'not liberal'?
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Dec. 07 2006,18:22)
Quote (Lou FCD @ Dec. 07 2006,18:10)
The members of my church were sadly disappointed that I would go to such a liberal college as BJ.
I'm scared to even ask, but what colleges did they view as 'not liberal'?
(Insert pic of SingSing here.)